Friday, June 09, 2023

Swan City Piano Festival Preview Lecture 2023

 

 

Preview Lecture: Swan City Piano Festival

June 8, 2023

Charles Hulin, D.M.A.

 

 

1.  Introduction

 

One of our local aesthetic heroes, Frank Lloyd Wright, is purported to have said, “Talking about music is like dancing about architecture.” Many other people have also purportedly said that, and Wright doesn’t strike me as someone who wouldn’t think he was good at talking about a thing. But if it is his statement, it sounds like he thinks the whole project of talking about music is absurd. While talking about music doesn’t seem nearly as hard to me as dancing about architecture, if anybody should have been able to dance about architecture, it ought to have been Frank Lloyd Wright. But I believe the entirety of the statement is buttressed on deep inner experiences of being moved by music that simply cannot be summed up with words.

 

And so I would like to muse for a few moments about how it might be that music moves us in inner spaces. My focus is that music is somehow a means of travel by which we glide over the shapes of life and quickly glean insights from doing so, all without leaving our seats right here in Harrison.

      

When we travel from place to place on earth, we never really go in a straight line. Because it’s a round planet, our straightest lines across its surface all end up being arcs. Every single journey we make has a rise and a fall. And for the curious, we travel one degree around our sphere roughly every seventy miles we go.

 

In the world of music, this arc-edness, or arched-ness, is called phrasing. We might even call it form. It’s both about how the music is shaped and about how we performers ride those shapes. That we call interpretation. And whether or not you think you understand what I’m talking about, you do. And not only that, you have done it yourselves!

 

As we sing “Happy Birthday” together, note the rise in your energy from the first statement to the higher second statement. And then, at the apex of the song, as we proclaim the name of the one with a birthday, we take more time with our singing. Finally, as the music arrives at its resting place, we all decelerate and some of you even add harmony emphasizing the completion of the journey!

 

Music teachers talk about what you just did with terms like “defying gravity,” “finding the escalator,” “keeping balls in the air.” I think this activity of phrasing is one of the things that makes us humans really love music. Those journeys up and down are so grounded in the realities of our existence.

 

To go a little further, as with any journey, where and how you begin, and what you take with you, determine so much about where and how you can go.

 

As we hear the first tense measures of Beethoven’s Pathetique Sonata, we have a sense that something like the extraordinarily sympathetic second movement is needed to mitigate that storm and stress. But even after that sublimely lyrical essay, we remember the first movement and desire the further unfurling we find in the sonata’s third movement. Starting at the beginning of Beethoven’s Pathetique, we can feel the logic of the relatedness and distances of its other movements. They are possible starting there. But we could not go so logically from there to music like Debussy’s First Arabesque, for example.  

 

Here I think of another arc word – ARK – which is a chest in which you might keep your most special things, or a vehicle in which you might survive a journey. And in those ways, music is also an ark. It conveys our consciousness so lightly and singularly through seas of human emotions crystalized by composers into beautiful patterning free of the chaos of our day-to-day experiencing.

 

So I invite you during this Swan City Piano Festival - during this particular season of listening and being moved - to ask where and how the journey of each piece you hear begins and what weights of feeling it is carrying. Imagine where it might go and then ride its up and downs to discover its realities.

 

Now I am going to highlight some of the works you will hear these next few days and comment on the itinerary - on the programing - of our artists which is especially brilliant this year.  I’ll begin each little discussion by emphasizing when and where each event will be taking place because a bottom line of enjoying these performances is being at the right place at the right time! All of that information is available, ingeniously color-coded in the program, and I encourage you to check and double-check so you’ll be sure to make it to the things you’re wanting to hear.

 

2.  Jihye Chang’s concert will be preceded by Erica Porter’s composer’s perspective presentation Friday at 6:15 right here at Harrison. That composer’s perspective time will introduce us to her musical world and to this year’s commissioned work titled “Glimpses.” Starting the evening by hearing from a living composer is perfect for Dr. Chang’s concert because she is engaged with a project and a passion to perform new works alongside what she calls her “bucket-list” of more established repertoire.

 

The subtitle for Friday’s performance is “Etudes (Fantasies) and Variations” and the programming is quite frankly, fascinating and fun. There is only time to highlight a few of the many works you will hear but maybe my words will serve as a bit of guide for your listening.

 

The performance will begin with Schumann’s enigmatic first opus, the Abegg Variations. Why enigmatic? Because its theme is derived from the musical notes that spell the name of one of Schumann’s friends. It is a little unclear if the Abegg of the variations was the friend as she appeared to be in daily life, or an idealized version of a friend in Schumann’s mind, or - my favorite option - the deeply noble inner Abegg whom Schumann was gifted to recognize. Whatever the case, those variations end with a fantasy, paving the way for the many imaginative flights of the evening. Of this early work, Schumann wrote to his mother, "What hopes and prophetic visions fill my soul's heaven…. Is it not a consoling thought that this first leaf of my fancy that flutters into the ether may find its way to some sore heart, bringing balm to soothe its pain and heal its wound?" You can hear he was so sensitive he could hardly stand himself, a quintessential Romantic almost too feeling for this life in this world.

 

Next will be the beautiful Berceuse of Chopin. A berceuse is a cradle song and how tenderly the single Chopin might have longed for experiences of family in his own life. With this work we hear one of those gentle beginnings that only allows for the delicate journeys of baby’s dreams.

 

Hear the opening passage of Chopin’s Berceuse. Note that Chopin is already varying his materials a few measures into the piece. This berceuse is itself a theme and variations.

 

I got a Glimpse of Erica Porter’s commissioned “Glimpse” and it seems to me that it starts in a similar place to Chopin’s Berceuse but provides shimmering sounds for our own times.

 

Next up, Dr. Chang has arranged what she calls a “Bouquet of Etudes,” and the expression pinpoints her way of programming with such accuracy. I remember my own mother arranging flowers, choosing each for its color and height and texture, and then placing them one by one until each was in just the right place to fulfill the beauty of the whole. That’s exactly how Dr. Chang’s “bouquets of etudes” work.

 

If you are wondering what an etude is, it’s a study. And most etudes are studies regarding particular problems for both performer and composer. The challenges of etudes can be technical or musical or something else altogether. Among other things, the etudes on this program explore the capabilities of the instrument. At times the piano will ring like bells, then sound like brass, and sing the sweetest songs . . .

 

By the way, if you’ve not been keeping track, Dr. Chang’s program will definitely get you caught up on etude writing in the 20th century. She begins with a bit of Czerny who bridged from the Classical to the Romantic pianists, but she leaps over the likes Chopin and Liszt to the more modern foundations of today’s piano writing with a selection from Debussy’s etudes. This etude, so called “for the five fingers,” begins with a quote of an exercise by Czerny but, as one commentator puts it, it “blooms wildly from there.”

 

Another seminal etude of our time in Dr. Chang’s bouquet is Ligeti’s “Fanfares” written in the 1980s which is full of figures from the composer’s horn trio.

 

A favorite of mine follows: Earl Wild’s transcription of Gershwin’s “Embraceable You.” Wild’s writing is in the grand tradition of Liszt and others who take a tune on a journey through many textures and moods. If you’re like me, you’ll melt at the sweetness of the effect.  

 

Newer etudes will abound as well, including Alex Tedow’s “Clump” which is a start-and-stop sort of trip in a style that has been described as “intellectual music for all demographics” You’ll hear “catchy melodies, striking harmonies, likeable quirkiness” all in a framework of “complexity and ingenuity.” (Wes Taylor, Eastman School of Music)

 

And yet another etude represents several on the program composed for Dr. Chang. This is “Silver Bells!” written by Sungji Hong just this year. This etude was inspired by Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Bells” and conveys that poem’s resonance through repeated patterns, eerie lines, and imitations of the complex pitch profiles of many types of bells.

 

Perhaps a review of a stanza from Poe will pique your interest.

      

Hear the sledges with the bells—
                 Silver bells!
What a world of merriment their melody foretells!
        How they tinkle, tinkle, tinkle,
           In the icy air of night!
        While the stars that oversprinkle
        All the heavens, seem to twinkle
           With a crystalline delight;
         Keeping time, time, time,
         In a sort of Runic rhyme,
To the tintinabulation that so musically wells
       From the bells, bells, bells, bells,
               Bells, bells, bells—
  From the jingling and the tinkling of the bells.

 

 3.  Tal Cohen will be performing Saturday at 7 at the Polk Museum of Art.

Regarding Tal Cohen, he is a Grammy Award winner whose music traverses many cultural worlds synthesizing his own geographical journeys from Israel to Australia to Miami and now even responding to some extent to what he sees on the walls of our own gallery here in Lakeland.  The venerated and versatile Terrence Blanchard has said that Tal Cohen “has the promise of being at the top of the curve changing our minds about music” and I especially like that quote because of all my own talk about arcs!

Jazz aficionados in this audience have no need for my thoughts about Tal Cohen’s music making, but for those piano enthusiasts who might feel a little outside of jazz, I would suggest that jazz at the piano is part of the same big conversation about music at the piano that classical pianists and many others have been holding since the first few loud and soft tones were sounded from the earliest forte-pianos.

 

That conversation spans these always-relevant issues: What can be said with just two hands on some number of keys? How can we make such an instrument sing? How can we invoke experiences of flow? How do we articulate such experiences with moments of emphasis and color? How might we employ the instrument’s percussiveness? And on and on. If you are lucky enough to have a seat for Saturday’s concert, I believe you will hear these and other such questions answered in personal and creative ways throughout the evening.

 

4.  Sun-A Park will conclude the festival on Sunday at 3 at First Presbyterian Church.

 

Dr. Park has provided such a well-crafted program that one could talk about its depth and interconnections all evening, but I won’t!

 

She will begin by serving us a delicious morsel of the music of Francois Couperin.

 

If you are not familiar with the Couperin line of musicians, allow me to explain that, for nearly a century, numerous Couperins served as musicians at Saint Gervaise in Paris, and that is a dynasty reminiscent of the Bachs in Saxony. Francois was the J.S. Bach of the Couperin line and was making music around the turn of the 18th century.

 

The exquisite Couperin work Dr. Tak will play should provide a sense of the ornamentation, the discursiveness, and the gentle dance-like quality of his harpsichord style. And as lovely as all that is, she’s sharing that music as a background to a great masterwork by Ravel, his Le Tombeau de Couperin.

 

You might guess that the word “tombeau” is a cognate for the English word “tomb,” and if you did, you would be right. For the purposes of Ravel’s music, tombeau refers specifically to a memorial monument. In fact, all the way back to the 16th century, musical and poetic tombeaux were written to memorialize important figures.

 

Having witnessed the horrors of the First World War as a military ambulance driver, Ravel sought a way to move forward through music, a way not laden by the expressive weight of German Romanticism but graced with a charm and character suggestive of an earlier Gallic time. And so his tombeau contains dance forms from Couperin’s era, each one modernized in memory of specific fallen friends.  

 

After intermission, and concluding the festival, Dr. Tak will present a very famous work that is literally and overtly structured around a theme of movement. I am referencing Pictures at an Exhibition, a work so well-known that I don’t even need to mention that it’s by Mussorgsky! Its journeys happen on least two easy-to-follow levels.

 

Mussorgsky has been thought of as a man with uneven legs, perhaps struggling with his weight, and it seems he has depicted his own asymmetrical gait with a promenade that alternates between measures in 5 and 6.  Through this personal stamp on his music, he invites us into what it feels like to move like him. Throughout this work, this music returns to remind us of his physical journey, part of his way of experiencing.

 

And where did he doing this promenading? He did it in an art gallery where his physical journey was transformed into an imaginative one, compliments of his late friend, Victor Alexandrovich Hartmann. The year after Hartmann’s death, Mussorgsky viewed his drawings on the walls of the St. Petersburg Architectural Association. Those drawings gave Hartmann’s impressions of locales from the markets and gardens of Limoge and Paris to scenes of the hardness of life in ghettos of Poland to ancient moonlit castles in Italy as well as his own designs for objects and buildings never completed in the physical world.


I think it is profoundly fitting that the musical journeys of this year’s festival lead us to a compelling vision of one such structure, Hartmann’s Great of Kiev, an edifice that can only be experienced through Mussorgsky’s memorable music. Maybe you will find yourself dancing about that architecture deep inside.  

Sunday, November 27, 2022

Theory

Our semester is drawing to a close and I find myself preparing reviews and summaries of what my students and I have done over the course of the fall. At this point of transition, I want to bring focus to the purpose of our work together. 

When my music theory students and I meet tomorrow, I plan to raise a question that is sometimes heard in theory classrooms: "When will I use this?" 

 

This question is often asked when an instructor has presented some concept or detail outside the student's usual conscious awareness.

Or perhaps it comes up because some intricacy of an unfamiliar style has felt a little out of the way.

Or maybe there is a still a gap between the logic of the academic discipline and the student's own logic.


Whatever the case, the student is not picturing a situation in which the information at hand will be relevant to the way of doing music they imagine for themselves.  

 

Of course there are numerous situations in which students might use such information.

To name a few: 

the final exam of the course

graduate record exams

major field exams for music teachers

placement exams for graduate programs

arranging music for ensembles 

collaborating with other musicians 

comprehending professional discussions of music

understanding music in such a way that they can explain it to others

etc.


Hopefully, we instructors keep reminding students of all the practical uses of their education as listed above.

But there is a larger picture for us to paint for our students, as well. 

The correct question is, indeed, "When will I use this?" 

But more emphasis should be put on the "I" than the "this."


The call of the college educator, and especially the educator in the arts, is never merely to prepare students to fit into an existing musical scene but to develop a breadth of musicianship in their students so that they might become the creators of new scenes. 

The call is not to train students to serve single styles but to empower them to express and touch and compel and refresh and envision and discover for the sake of their listeners.

The call is not to teach them to have skills relevant in the short term but to inspire them to become artists whose work speaks to the human experience in the long run.


And the response of the music student is to take all they are given by applied mentors and theory instructors and ensemble directors and diction coaches and history professors - all they have been given by these folks who have devoted decades of their lives to the consideration of music - and apply it to the settings in which they, themselves, will make music. 

It seems to me that might be one important way of defining professionalism. 

The finest musicians I have known have typically been the ones who received their training with humility and applied it with creativity, thoughtfulness, and enthusiasm.  


P.S. Thank you to my theory students at Southeastern who have always made teaching a pleasure!

Saturday, June 11, 2022

2022 Swan City Piano Festival

A lecture I had the privilege of delivering on the opening night of the 2022 Swan City Piano Festival here in Lakeland, FL. It highlights the performances of Robert Fleitz, John C. O'Leary, and Hannah Sun, and celebrates the good work of the festival.

 

Welcoming Presentation 

Swan City Piano Festival - June 9, 2022

Charles Hulin

 

“I like it but I don’t understand it.” Those are the heartbreaking words people sometimes say about musical performances. Somehow the idea that one needs specialized knowledge to really enjoy classical music can get into our minds and stand in the way of own experience.

 

As someone who spends a lot of time thinking about music, I want you to know that the way music moves us is a mystery. And a mystery in this sense is not something to be understood. It is something to be experienced. We don’t measure a mystery. We enter into a relationship with a mystery. And that is an invitation to know our own sense of joy.  

 

John C. O’Leary, (jazz pianist and neuroscientist who you will be hearing Saturday) has this to say about that mystery: “Art can create a space where dialog can occur.” And so it is this evening that I am thinking of the space that music creates and I’m starting the dialog in hopes that we might all be able to fully experience the musical wonders of these days. 

 

Over the next hour, I will share many specifics about the music in this series of concerts, but first I would like to speak generally in case anyone is struggling with that sense of just not knowing enough. If, over the course of the concerts, that thought starts to creep in, I encourage you to do what you would do in any good relationship: keep listening. Listen for a melody you could sing. Listen for a rhythm to which you might move. Observe the pictures the music paints. Tune into whatever emotion the sounds stir within you. Seek to enjoy being with the music wherever it goes. And I will let you in on a secret. Whatever you discover as you listen, that’s what we musicians want to know. That is the valid experience as far as we are concerned.

 

Tomorrow night, Robert Fleitz will be presenting a recital touching on the topic of home. We define home in many ways: our place of origin, our sense of belonging, rootedness . . . and across the generations, musicians have processed a great deal about what home is because the nature of our field has often required that we leave home to study, to find work, to travel and to perform.

 

Robert is so good about loving his Lakeland home and contributes to its musical culture in wonderful, sustained ways. He is also very at home in the world of new music.  He makes me think of one of our Juilliard teachers, Joel Sachs. Dr. Sachs said he woke up one morning and realized that, through his research, he was so involved with a day in the life of Schumann 100-plus years ago that he was missing out on living now. He went on to say that there are Schumanns living today, and how exciting and meaningful it can be to involve ourselves with those living geniuses and their work.

 

In that tradition, what Robert has planned for us shows us a bit of what has happened but will focus mostly on what is happening. To put an exclamation point on the whole idea, he will go on to show us what he is making happen by inspiring and commissioning composers to write music that will be heard for the first time right here. 

 

In terms of what has happened, Robert’s recital will feature some well-known names from the past. For example, the concluding work of his program will be a piece by Manuel de Falla which evokes the spirit of the people of de Falla’s home region in Spain through gestures of Flamenco music including fanfares and laments, suggestions of guitar strumming and castanet clicking, and maybe even some heel stomping.

 

I mention that concluding work because it seems to me to be the repertoire starting point for the real action of the evening. By that I mean de Falla’s imaginative way of portraying sounds and scenes outside the traditional world of piano music is one reasonable root for the music of the more recent composers on the program. That is not to suggest that any of the other composers were thinking of de Falla as they were writing but that their musical approaches might seem closer to his than to those of the earlier composers we will hear, Grieg and Chopin. To me, Grieg and Chopin seem more like prehistory to what’s going on in Robert’s program. They are like the Garden of Eden - a world that once was - ‘In the beginning, Chopin!’

 

And when it comes to longing for home, Chopin’s life and death are the stuff of legend.  He spent most of his adulthood in France but always considered himself a Pole and arranged on his deathbed for his heart to be smuggled into Poland and interred in a pillar of Holy Cross Church in Warsaw.

 

Now regarding what is going on, Robert will share a veritable rainbow of colorful works by living composers. We would do well to note that his programming reflects the fact that the voices of women have become a much more overt part of the musical conversation in these last fifty years. We will be strangely soothed by the vaguely bluesy work “Homesickness” by Emahoy Geubrou, a 98-year-old Ethiopian nun who spent her formative years in exile.  We will be stirred by Asha Srinivasan’s eclectic “Mercurial Reveries.” Srinivasan, a professor at Lawrence University, seeks to put “old and new musics together on stage.” In “Mercurial Reveries” she does this by filtering aspects of Hindi music through techniques reminiscent of Bartok and Copland. And we will hear performance artist Meredith Monk’s minimalistic “Railroad” which I think is the product of a beautiful creative process she has described. She says writing a piece of music is a like cooking a soup. You have your materials – in the case of a soup these are carrots and potatoes and broth and so forth. You let those materials be the materials. You trust them. You don’t judge them.  You slowly boil them. You refine them. And eventually there comes a time to put them into a form that brings out their essence. “Follow that,” she says. Follow that essence.

 

And so we arrive at those composers who know Robert and write music for him to play here first.

 

In 2020, Liliya Ugay wrote “Raqs” for the Swan City Festival. Raqs means dance in Arabic, and the piece is an interesting programming parallel to the Flamenco-informed music of de Falla. Liliya’s dance inspiration comes from her homeland of Uzbekistan and I encourage you to google Uzbek dance between now and tomorrow night so you can see the sometimes lyrical/sometimes dramatic style of dance that develops from small movements of the fingers, expands through the arm, and ultimately includes the whole body twirling in climactic passages. To my ear, Liliya’s music is permeated by those sorts of progressions; and in playing it, it seems even the pianist’s body is drawn into expressing a similiar choreography.

 

[Brian Dozier Brown’s “Lacustrine” is this year’s commission to be discussed at its premier tomorrow.]

 

Finally, I want to comment on an especially bright spot in my preparation for this lecture, and that was my first experience of the music of Krists Auznieks. Robert will be playing his “Pathmarks” which reaches deep into a prehistory of Bach through the more recent rooting of composers like Stravinsky. No doubt you will hear many layers in this music moving at different paces and playing out expanded ideas of counterpoint. And that is one side of what struck me as so beautiful about this work. Its structure is so intelligent and substantive at the same time that it generates an affect of genuine warmth and joy. That’s such a difficult balance to strike!

 

View Auznieks "Pathmarks" here.


On Saturday, as I referenced earlier, John C. O’Leary will be with us. A musician and a scientist, he is concerned about communication. In discussing a recent project, he noted that there is often a lack of communication between science and society. One element in the struggle for communication has to do with the means by which the information is communicated. Sometimes the words are too technical, the presentation too dense, the framing disorienting, and so forth.

 

While I don’t know exactly what John will play on Saturday, one thing I admire about his work is the way it communicates so clearly. We might think of the texture of a piece of music in terms of a continuum from transparent to opaque. Some pieces make their composers’ choices immediately and disappointingly apparent. Other works are so thick we almost wonder if there was an organizing hand at play at all. I think what John’s music offers is a very satisfying version of translucency. There’s light to see a lot of what’s going on in his music. We can almost narrate it as it unfolds: There’s a groove that’s making us move. And now what’s going on with that bass line? Wait! It feels like there’s an extra beat in these measures! Oh, and here comes that sweet series of chords again. Sounds a little like Schumann.

 

As John improvises, he takes us by the ear and makes sure we hear the choices he wants us to consider. It’s almost as if the music is its own interpretation. But when and how those choices arise remains a mystery. To use a different metaphor, John has a way of making us feel at home as he leads us through unfamiliar terrain. 

 

I’m going to let you in on another secret. Just in case you are not already a jazz enthusiast, you might be intrigued to know a lot of us classical pianists really enjoy listening to jazz. There’s something about composing happening more or less in real time that fascinates and inspires us. It’s one of the most creative things. 

 

John C. O'Leary plays "Blackbird" here.

 

Now, about Sunday. If I were to give Hannah Sun’s program a title, I would call it “Transformations.” Transformation was a quintessential concern for Romantic-Era composers, and I think the desire for transformation might be one of our most deeply human traits.

 

Hannah’s program will begin with a master of transformation, a composer with the Midas touch, the legendary Chopin. And while I described his music as the prehistory of Robert’s program, Hannah’s program positions us to be awed by the vast and exquisite nature of the musical world that was his.

 

The brightness of that world will suddenly appear when Hannah plays the first of Chopin’s 24 Etudes. You’re likely to think, “My goodness, a human hand can do that!” Like Bach before him, Chopin initiated his magnum opus with a piece in C major that is basically hymn-like harmonies energized by rolling chords. The description sounds simple, but the effect is stunning. For the sake of comparison, I will play the first few measures of Bach’s prelude and the opening phrase of Chopin’s last etude, the so-called “Ocean Etude,” in which he uses the same strategy as in the etude Hannah will be playing.

 

For nearly two centuries, Chopin’s etudes have provided the fundamental technical training of professional pianists. With them, Chopin revolutionized the very way we touch the instrument, and he elevated the etude form from a mere study to a concert-worthy demonstration of sweeping musicality. It is this transformational quality that typifies Chopin’s genius. Whatever he turns his hand to, he imbues with an expressiveness than had not been imagined before. We will experience that most compellingly in the juxtaposition of two nocturnes, the first by the inventor of the form and the second by Chopin.

 

The Irish pianist John Field created the nocturne, by combining a singing melody with a flowing accompaniment. His nocturnes provide a reposeful setting for his rather impressive skill at manipulating melodies. I will play a portion of the nocturne Hannah has programmed to give us both a sense of the nighttime tone of his music as well as the quality of his melodic gift. I want to point out that he varies the melody in such enchanting ways that we could easily not even realize we are hearing the same melody twice!

 

Field did that all so nicely within the boundaries he had set for the form, but Chopin knew so much more was possible. As I say to my students, anything that can happen at night can happen in a Chopin nocturne: a lovely dream, a nightmare, an obsessive thought, a bout of insomnia, an asthma attack . . . and always the hope of a coming sunrise. You can sense the range even in the words Chopin writes on his scores. The story of one of his nocturnes can be tracked through his expressive directions: Larghetto, appassionato, cresc., con forza, smorz., sotto voce, pianississimo, forte poco stretto, fortissimo, legatissimo, rallentando e dolcissimo.

 

Hannah will follow up her performances of Chopin and Field with her own essay in transformation, a work called “Plastisphere.” We will see and hear that she transforms the instrument into a harp, a wave, and an ocean with the songs of birds above and whales below. With those transformations she creates a space where dialog can occur about the way we treat the oceans and the creatures that call them home. As a composer, I especially appreciate that this music resonates with the piano writing of Ravel and Debussy without ever becoming derivative. That’s also hard to do!

 

Hannah Sun plays her "Platisphere" here.

 

After her own music, Hannah will treat us to one of the golden treasures of the standard piano repertoire, Beethoven’s 30th sonata, Opus 109. Beethoven’s music functions as a hinge connecting the Classical and Romantic periods, and he is arguably the source of all things transformational since that time. The thing that moves me so much about Beethoven’s way of being transformational is that he takes the humblest materials – simple scales and triads – and turns them into the noblest and most enduring of musical expressions. It’s like alchemy. And how he does it also reminds me of another Juilliard professor, one of Hannah’s teachers, Jerome Lowenthal, who would sometimes describe a piece of music as the story of interval (an interval being a very simple measurement between two notes). In this Sonata, Beethoven begins with a third that grows ever so gently into a fourth. And it happens again and again all along the path of a descending scale. That interval takes a little journey and begins to be transformed. Next it broadens as the drama of the music starts to be revealed. That passage is so sweet and intense, but in another way, it’s just a matter of rising and falling through the notes of a scale. Fast forward to the second movement and the mood has become very stern, but the materials are the same only now the third is falling. I won’t continue to outline how Beethoven generates a complete range of characters from those basic materials but please know as you listen that the expressiveness of all you hear in this piece arises from his insight into the possibilities of those intervals and that scale.   


After Beethoven, Hannah will share a selection of Rachmaninoff preludes, preludes in which Rachmaninoff continued Chopin’s work of transforming the form.  Suffice it to say Rachmaninoff’s preludes are always gratifying to hear and to play. The improvisatory and discursive qualities traditionally associated with the prelude form make it a perfect match for some of Rachmaninoff’s most intimate musical impulses. And the heroic B flat prelude is a positively oceanic tour de force

 

Hannah has chosen to conclude her recital with one of Franz Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsodies, and in doing so, she brings this season of the Festival full circle. Like de Falla and Liliya Ugay, Liszt transformed his piano writing with an infusion of dance music from back home. When the piece starts, we will immediately know we have entered a new soundscape conditioned by the instruments of the Gypsy (Romany) orchestra. Shimmering cimbalom tremolos and reckless fiddle tunes will evoke moods from the mournful to the menacing, the proud and the nostalgic. This music is just one of many signs of how fully Liszt entered the space of dialog. Liszt took numerous opportunities to spend time with the Romany people trying to understand their culture and their music-making. His own introduction to the Hungarian Rhapsodies grew into a two-volume work reflecting on those experiences. But he went even further, involving himself in their lives by assuming responsibility for the welfare and education of a promising young Romany violinist who later named his own son after Liszt.

To conclude this whirlwind tour of the festival performances, I would like to reference a philosophy put forward by the former president of Juilliard, Joseph Polisi. Throughout his tenure at the school, Dr. Polisi developed and promulgated an approach to the role of the artist that he called “artist as citizen.” It can be briefly outlined with two quotations from his book by the same name. In the preface, he writes, “I have formed the conviction that artists must become active members of their communities, working effectively and methodically to ensure that the arts are a vital element in the fabric of society. Performing artists must no longer believe that their ‘work’ stops at the end of the performance. Active involvement of artist-citizens who are well-informed about the political, economic, and social components of our world will be the only way to realize the positive impact of the arts on our schools, organizations, and this world as we move forward in the twenty-first century.” In the epilogue, he concludes, “My messages in this volume reflect an optimism about the decades ahead because of my faith in the Juilliard tradition, a tradition that instills in its practitioners a love for life, a dedication to the highest levels of the artistic profession, and a belief that artists bring a positive and transformative element to our society. With that belief in mind, I know the future is in good hands.”

 

In so many ways, the Swan City Piano Festival epitomizes this artist-as-citizen model. As we see over these next few days how local institutions are involved, children are engaged, masterclasses are provided, interdisciplinary work is commissioned and presented, musical wonders are made accessible, and we are all challenged to consider the world’s cultures and creatures, I think we might join in Dr. Polisi’s optimism in recognizing that the future of the arts is indeed in good hands.

 


 

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Christmas Carols and the Gospels

I posted the little study below several years back and wanted to share it again with a new preface.

In the original post, I referenced inflatable bears, elves, and so forth being added to the nativity scenes in neighbors' yards. I usually start this carol discussion with my students by asking what non-biblical characters they've seen added to such scenes in our town. 

Flamingos joining the animals? 

Frosty adding his voice to the angelic choir? 

Yoda bowing in the direction of the manger? 

(These have all been sighted!)

This year, it occurred to me that such light-hearted additions to the creche actually serve as a witness to a profound truth: We live in the time between the most intimate manger scene of Bethlehem and the universal worship of Revelation. Just as a number of our carols begin with the holy family, expand to include shepherds then magi, finally putting us in the scene, the Kin-dom of God expands inexorably through the worship of our own time on its way to that final future peace of full communion between God and all Creation.

 


During this Christmas season, it has occurred to me that it would be a good devotional exercise to survey the commonly sung Christmas carols in terms of their Gospel content. That is, to take note of which carol is based on which Gospel narrative of the nativity. I’m sure may others have already done this, but I’ve enjoyed doing it for myself.

 

Sometimes we carry around a mental version of the nativity that is essentially St. Francis’s beautiful manger scene with everyone in attendance (Mary, Joseph, the baby Jesus, animals, shepherds, wise men, and angels). The cast of characters grows in the yards of neighbors as inflatable polar bears, elves, and dinosaurs join the scene. But that’s a different story.

 

The gospel writers, however, chose specific details to make their points about Jesus. (Don’t we all?) Their separate versions seem to have been written to stand alone and don’t particularly need to be combined.   

 

In addition to the fact that my little survey might enhance someone’s biblical literacy (mine, at the very least) I also think it is a valuable exercise for raising awareness of what is actually in these carols. Details of the familiar go by almost completely without notice and it’s possible that many of us had a joyful moment with “Joy to the World” or experienced a serene mood as we sang “Silent Night” without registering the richness of these texts yet again this year.

 

If you are intrigued by the whole concept, maybe you should undertake such a survey yourself before reading on. Or at least do a quick check of the carols you have in your head with your memory of the Gospels.


As I did my survey, I realized that the categories I thought I would use are not as clear-cut as I expected. That’s pretty much how these sorts of things usually go. For clarity’s sake, though, I’ve still basically sorted the carols as being based on Matthew, Luke, or a combination of the two.

 

That said, some carols seem to have an overlay of language that might be drawn from John 1. I didn’t try to keep track of that. 

 

Another potential subcategory would be the carol that is clearly about one Gospel but has some general reference from the other that colors it but doesn’t rise to the level that would make the carol a full-blown combination of the two.  For example, “Brightest and Best” and “As with Gladness Men of Old” both reference the manger (Luke) but they are primarily about the wise men (Matthew).  “O Come Little Children” and “Silent Night” both mention a star (Matthew) but are otherwise firmly rooted in Luke.

 

Yet another type is the carol that briefly references something from a Gospel but ultimately amounts to a theological discussion using that reference as a starting point. “It Came upon a Midnight Clear” and “Good Christian Men Rejoice” follow this pattern.

 

Here’s a brief summary of some features that differentiate the Gospel nativity narratives:

 

Matthew

Angel talks to Joseph

Isaiah reference to Immanuel

Guiding star

Wise men visit where the Christ-child lives

Flight into Egypt

 

Luke

Angel talks to Mary

Angel chorus proclaims the birth

Shepherds visit the baby Jesus who is in the manger

 

John

Word becomes flesh

 

And now for my sorting:

 

Matthew

As with Gladness Men of Old

Brightest and Best

We Three Kings of Orient Are

 

Luke

Angels We Have Heard on High

Away in a Manger

Child in the Manger

Go Tell It on the Mountain

Good Christian Men Rejoice

Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

How Great Our Joy

Infant Holy, Infant Lowly

It Came upon the Midnight Clear

O Come, All Ye Faithful

Oh Come, Little Children

O Little Town of Bethlehem

Silent Night

 

Combination of Matthew and Luke

Angels, from the Realms of Glory

Gentle Mary Laid Her Child

Rise Up, Shepherd, and Follow

Sing We Now of Christmas

The First Nowell

There’s a Song in the Air

What Child Is This

 

Other

Joy to the World – Psalm 98

 

P.S. Those who worship in liturgical churches are probably pretty aware of all this as your services tend to follow one Gospel or the other in a given year.  Those of us who organize and play Christmas concerts might find an impetus for some new creative work in those liturgical traditions and present events based on one Gospel's version or the other.